CT volume analysis in living donor liver transplantation: accuracy of three different approaches.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study is to compare and evaluate accuracy of three different approaches of liver volume quantification in living donor transplantations. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of 60 donors. The total and right lobe liver volumes were analyzed in the portal-venous phase by two independent radiologists who estimated the volumes using manual, semi-automated and automated segmentation methods. The measured right lobe liver volume was compared to the real weight of the graft after back-table examinations. RESULTS: The mean estimated overall liver volume was 1164.4 ± 137.0 mL for manual, 1277.4 ± 190.4 mL for semi-automated and 1240.1 ± 108.5 mL for automated segmentation. The mean estimated right lobe volume was 762.0 ± 122.4 mL for manual, 792.9 ± 139.9 mL for semi-automated and 765.4 ± 132.7 mL for automated segmentation. The mean graft weight was 711.2 ± 142.9 g. The manual method better correlated with the graft weight (r = 0.730) in comparison with the semi-automated (r = 0.685) and the automated (r = 0.699) methods (p < 0.001). The mean error ratio in volume estimation by each application was 12.7 ± 16.6% for manual, 17.1 ± 17.3% for semi-automated, 14.7 ± 16.8% for automated methods. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean error ratio of the manual and the semi-automated segmentations (p = 0.017), and no statistically significant difference between the manual and the automated applications (p = 0.199). CONCLUSION: Volume analysis application better correlates with graft weight, but there is no obvious difference between correlation coefficients of all three methods. All three modalities had an error ratio, of which the semi-automated method showed the highest value. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Volume analysis application was more accurate, but there is no drastic difference between correlation coefficients of all three methods.

An economic impact of incorrect referrals for MRI and CT scans: A retrospective analysis.

Background and Aims: Up to date, no research on the economic efficacy of diagnostic modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT), has been done in Central Asia. The aim of this study was to analyse the inappropriate appointments of MRI and CT scanning procedures in Kazakhstan. Methods: We used the imaging diagnostic reports and medical records from 9725 planned outpatient CT and MRI exams performed in two major hospitals in Almaty. The study period was for the period 2014-2019. The independent experts-radiologists evaluated the MRI and CT exams for validity using the ACR® compliance standards and RCR recommendations. Results: The results showed that the combined costs of MRI and CT scans increased by $17.982 between 2014 ($22.537) and 2019 ($40.519), p = 0.002. The highest rate of MRI examinations was observed in 2019, with a rate of 6.9 per 10,000 people. It was determined that in 2019 the highest rate for men who undertook CT was equal to 12.4 per 10,000 people, while for women it was equivalent to 5.7 per 10,000 patients. The majority of non-corresponding imaging examinations (n = 1304) were referred for MRI and CT scans by general practitioners. We detected the irrational referrals for head and neck radiological examinations in n = 178 (13.7%) cases, and the abdominal cavity checks in n = 249 (19.1%) cases (p = 0.001). The main portion of erroneously unreasonable referrals for examination of the abdominal organs was made by surgeons in n = 43 (3.3%) cases. Conclusion: The findings indicated an increase in the number of referrals for unnecessary CT and MRI tests over the research period (2014-2019). It had a substantial impact on the rise in healthcare system expenses. The results demonstrate the need for the education of GPs and improving the approaches for diagnostics.

Radical versus conservative surgical management for liver hydatid cysts: A single-center prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We prospectively compared the clinical outcomes of radical and conservative surgical procedures for primary liver hydatid cysts, additionally radical surgical procedures with and without the two-month administration of albendazole after the operation were compared. METHODS: Overall, 90 patients undergoing open surgical treatment for liver hydatid cysts were divided into three surgical groups: first group, patients who underwent radical surgery (pericystectomy) followed by albendazole treatment for 2 months following the operation group; second group, patients who underwent radical surgery(pericystectomy) without receiving albendazole after surgery group; third group, patients, who underwent conservative surgery (partial cystectomy) with albendazole treatment after surgery. The clinical outcomes and rate of recurrence were analyzed in follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean surgery duration in the Radical groups was significantly longer in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group. (212.0 and 202.5 min vs. 173.2 min; p < 0.05). Blood loss in the Radical groups was significantly higher in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (218.3 and 174.6 ml vs. 67.2 ml; p < 0.05). However, postoperative complication rate in the Radical group was significantly lower in comparison to Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (13.3% [n = 4] and 6.7% [n = 2] vs. 36% [n = 11]; p < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay in both Radical groups was significantly lower in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (7.9 and 7.4 days vs. 11.3 days; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In comparison to conservative surgery, radical surgery is a preferable treatment modality for patients with active liver hydatid cysts. Postoperative albendazole treatment is preferable, regardless of the type of surgical procedure.

Evolution of Liver Transplantation in Kazakhstan: Two-Era Experience of a Single Center, the First Report.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has been performed in Kazakhstan since 2011. The present study aimed to analyze the outcomes of the most experienced liver transplant center in Kazakhstan. METHODS: Between December 2011 and December 2018, 131 liver transplantations were performed at A.N. Syzganov's National Scientific Center of Surgery. The clinical data of 88 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantations from December 2011 to December 2017 were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the periods in which the procedure was performed: the early era (2011-2014; n = 25) and the late era (2015-2017; n = 63). The clinical course and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the characteristics of the recipients. The patients who were treated during the late era had significantly better survival rates compared with the early era (1 year, 90.5%; 3 year, 79.6%; vs 1 year, 67.7%; 3 year 63.3%; P < .05). Right lobe grafts were used significantly more frequently during the late era (P < .05), while splenectomy was indicated significantly less frequently (P < .05). We also noted a decrease in the complication rate, including early postoperative mortality (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 7 years, the liver transplant program has been established, and the operative techniques used in living donor liver transplant have changed dramatically. Patient survival has been improving with increased experience.

Extra-Anatomic Jump Graft Arterial Reconstruction Using a Great Saphenous Vein Autograft During Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), successful microsurgical arterial reconstruction is essential but quite challenging. Dissection of the hepatic artery extending to the celiac trunk is a rare complication during liver transplantation. Kazakhstan is an area in which deceased donor grafts are not sufficient for several reasons, and the availability of graft vessels is limited. METHODS: We herein report the case of a 65-year-old patient who underwent LDLT due to hepatitis B + D virus-coinfected liver cirrhosis complicated by hepatic artery dissection extending to the celiac trunk. Because of massive gastric collateral varices, direct anastomosis to the supraceliac aorta was not possible. Therefore, extra-anatomic jump graft reconstruction was performed from the right iliac artery to the graft's hepatic artery using an autologous graft vein (great saphenous vein). RESULTS: The patient's postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was discharged at 27 days post-transplantation. At the time of writing, the follow-up period is 8 months after transplantation, and the recipient maintains a normal liver function. CONCLUSION: When there is no other option for arterial reconstruction, this method is a feasible option for performing extra-anatomic jump graft reconstruction.